/sci/ - Science & Math

>>16097755
>First you claimed
>>Literally every single denier claim has been refuted,
>Now you complain there's too much to refute.
>Which is it?
Read, motherfucker
>>16097740
>The fact that Holocaust scholars have refuted all their claims, somewhere, at some point, in some equally obscure place is quietly ignored or, if it can be shown, attributed to the grand conspiracy.

>So you're saying you failed to successfully defend the Holocaust fable and now just defend jews.
Yes, this is the game you play. You demand that I, personally, comb through over fifty books of spurious claims, then read at LEAST that much again in order to know how to refute it all, and if I can't do it right here and now, you're "unrefuted" and we have to question the entire Holocaust. You position yourself as an expert on the Holocaust in order to lend your voice authority, but you can only do this because you know that laymen, who likewise are not experts on the Holocaust, won't be able to tell that you're not, or at least not confirm it; and they have to take your word that the refutations, which you are in many cases probably actually more aware of than the laymen, don't exist.

So to sidestep your dishonest bullshit I'm just going to focus on the part where you claim all Jews are complicit in a global decades-spanning nefarious conspiracy, which is obviously ridiculous.