[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.15340543 [View]
File: 2.84 MB, 360x202, Accretion Disk.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15340543

>>15340536
>how do you calculate
What is "the cause". The numbers will never tell you "the cause".

>between 2 spherical masses?
Oh you mean the "null point? Yes tell the audience what exactly is there at this "nullpoint" causing this "gravitational attraction" (which is another useless description like "magnetic attraction)? Tell me what happens when the "2 spherical masses" happen to also be magnets?

>> No.15335859 [View]
File: 2.84 MB, 360x202, Accretion Disk.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15335859

>>15335814
>Einstein said
He did say a lot of complete hogwash, yeah.
>>15335823
>Here bro, here's a concept that "traveling" and "speed" has no bearing on because "time" is now dimensional.
>>15335660
>Kosher light user says
Do you really want another 100 years of bullshit?
>>15335727
>>15335733
>There's still unknowns around universe fundamentals and people have already described potential FTL experiments
There is no empirical evidence light travels, let alone "has a speed".
>>15335751
Because a crackpot who fucked his cousin said so.
>>15335848
>Information travels faster than light
Without a "waveform" or polarity change (in other words another "wave" basically), how do you even distinguish "information" from....whatever the fuck else you think classifies as "information"? What else do you think is "traveling in a vacuum"?


Here's the bigger question for all, how do you travel "in a vacuum" without negating the fucking "Vacuum" in the first place? If there's something in it....how the fuck is that a "vacuum"?

>> No.15303785 [View]
File: 2.84 MB, 360x202, Accretion Disk.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15303785

>>15298051
>is
It's no different than what's around it (which is of course "space" the magical place with no properties that somehow acts upon things according to some delusional crackpots)

>>15303771
>It wans't captured by this light capturing device, it was captured by the other one

Oh yes, "the other one". Because that's magically going to make those light waves stop distorting producing a shadow for you to chase and call "a black hole" (a fucking polarized distortion of light cause by the medium it passes through). Especially when you use light itself to measure and distort the signal more, that makes sense.
If the analog method didn't work, why in the fuck did they make an interpolation method of the method that didn't work? What the fuck are they smoking and where can I get some?

>> No.15232510 [View]
File: 2.84 MB, 360x202, Accretion_Disk.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15232510

>>15219810
Is anyone aware of any good part time jobs where you can get away with studying for classes during your spare time at work?

>> No.15200284 [View]
File: 2.84 MB, 360x202, Accretion Disk.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15200284

>>15199780
>Is that supposed to be a black hole?
No it's just fucking magnetism

>A black hole isn't nothing.
Keep defining your objects of interest using absence/lack. I'm sure eventually you'll get blue in the face from chasing all the shadows.

>> No.15182817 [View]
File: 2.84 MB, 360x202, Accretion Disk.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15182817

>>15182433
>pi
>math
>its actually how you draw circles on calculators and computer programs.

It's impossible because you're relying on an expression and not a quantity.

>> No.15046181 [View]
File: 2.84 MB, 360x202, Accretion Disk.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15046181

>>15046159
>Dude what?
Like I said, I'm making everyone hate me. I'm not singling out a single "scientist" or schizo among you bored bunch.

>>15046159
>Electrolysis is chemical process
>electrolysis
>electro
>electrification
>as in electrification is used to spur this chemical process
Try to keep up.

>How do you explain what is happening on the tape?
It's separating "water" into two flammable gasses "hydrogen" and "oxygen". The "oil" is the residual slag of the electrodes destroying themselves you dip. It's literally rust. I have done the same thing using nails and mason jars.

>> No.14977290 [View]
File: 2.84 MB, 360x202, Accretion Disk.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14977290

>>14977268
beliefs=/=knowledge

>>14977284
>Even more interesting is why philosophy is discussed far more on /sci/ than /his/
Because materialism/atomism is a belief system? The majority of physics topics actually does belong on /x/, especially the ones about those alleged "black holes" and "dark matter". Imagine believing something with absolutely no proof, amirite?

>> No.14961740 [View]
File: 2.84 MB, 360x202, Accretion Disk.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14961740

>>14960100
>Explaining a null result instead of just forming an actual, proper hypothesis and doing an experiment

It's an undetectable MEDIUM, just like Einstein said. There is no experiment that can prove the existence of it, it can only be logically inferred as the truth simple because "there is no other way".

>> No.10799865 [View]
File: 2.84 MB, 360x202, 334m4h.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10799865

like literal plasma?

maybe a fast rotating ring of super heated plasma.
see pic
How fast and stable could we get these things?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]