[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.14581569 [View]
File: 119 KB, 1024x790, Phase-B-system-study-extension-11-1024x790.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14581569

>>14581557
if shuttle lived up to the promises you get a massive space station in the '80s and moonbase/mars in the '90s, but i just don't see any designs on the table that were close to capable of that. flyback s-ic with a j-2 shuttle was probably the best in retrospect but even then 15 launches a year was probably pushing it.

>> No.14570811 [View]
File: 119 KB, 1024x790, 588F80D6-BD8E-4528-BD5A-F887FFD6EB13.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14570811

Winged Saturn V…home

>> No.14552307 [View]
File: 119 KB, 1024x790, B49C5366-7AFE-40BB-A429-A832BF707FDF.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14552307

I have a weird alt history idea. What if NASA realized they could save some post-Apollo money by making the Saturn V fully or partially reusable instead of building the shuttle?

>Add wings to the first stage S-IC so it can fly back to the launch site
>Stretch the S-II second stage. Add a heatshield on the front. Let the second stage reach orbit then land under parachutes after.
>Remove the S-IVB third stage
>Replace the S-IVB with a 10 METER WIDE capsule with a payload bay and parachutes.
Fully reusable, same payload as the shuttle, doesn’t need new R and D for engines and whatnot. Thoughts?

Pic unrelated, except it shows that NASA considered flying the S-IC back with wings for a while

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]