/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15134133
cont'd

What are the best resources you've encountered that explain the change of power throughout history?
>also best marketing resources

>Andrew Tate
He had a history of media work to base his marketing off
How would I start with ideas as..outlandish as mine?

I doubt I could sell a persona for people to buy, how could I jumpstart this on tiktok or something?

If anyone is willing to help me I'm offering whatever crap my guide to life is as well as my general intent to just disrupt things for the better

>>14798646
The issue is with the use of the term 'free', it is vague and often causes more questions than can be truly defined.
I posit, we push forward with the term 'degree' of will, which differentiates the capacities of willpower between individuals, beings and organisms as a whole.
Understanding this concept, we expand on this idea and introduce the aspect of time, which allows us to view the progression of these 'degrees' of will as the 'evolution' of will.

If you understand that at the beginning of the universe, will, defined as an object, entity or agent's ability to carry out tasks, the will of the universe is simply expressed as the progression of the universe since the inception of the big bang. This is to understand that the laws of physics impelled different states of the universe as time passed, until incidentally, the inception of life, abiogenesis.
The universe manifests will as unconscious life existing and evolving, through the laws of physics and time until consciousness and will was conceptualised? and acted upon.
Life evolved and will evolved with it, in regards to humans, the development of a more powerful brain and hands has propelled the quality of lives immensely through this expanded will.
The collective will of humanity has grown as humanity has progressed with learning and technology.

If you assume that humanity continues to exist AND will continues to grow with the capacity of humans, the limit is now where we define 'free' will. Free, as defined as exceeding all constraints. discarding compatibalist defintions of 'free', we reach the ineffable concept of Godhood.

I end my essay here because to explain or even attempt to understand the greatest reaches of human efforts in the far future are too daunting to even begin. I make the argument that 'degrees' of will allows for the implication of 'free' will insofar as describing humanity's ascent to God.

So many variables affect your perception and consciousness of reality and your ability to interact and manipulate it like genetics and environment and personal history
The literal chemical structures of our brain and consciousness are similar but still vary hugely in interpretation of reality

>your agency to succeed in life has slowly been siphoned away through mandatory learning and dopamine dumps
>whatever free will you possess is actually limited
>the only way to prove you aren’t an npc is to succeed

We’re under the false assumption that because we all share the common denominator of being awake and human, that we share even similar abilities to interpret our environments

>iq test differences imply massive perceptual cognitions amongst the population
>niggers may literally see through boon lenses

I’m just saying, convincing people really takes empathy and wisdom. You’d think someone would have managed to distill these concepts to create a more cohesive social and intelligence theory to dominate humanity under the guise of religion instead of just money
>think jewish propaganda and unity

>might write an essay
>most of you aren’t going to be able to break free from your npc nature to utilise the insight from this post