/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15270784
>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9464417/

Shitton of exclusion criteria.
Is not a study but a "cherrypick" meta-analysis

>>15270784
>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/8369458_Thimerosal_Exposure_in_Infants_and_Developmental_Disorders_A_Retrospective_Cohort_Study_in_the_United_Kingdom_Does_Not_Support_a_Causal_Association

Also nice exclusion criteria:
"Children with Read and OXMIS codes relating to a variety ofprenatal, perinatal, and postnatal conditions that occurred before 6 months of age were excluded as were children who were re-corded as having an outcome event in the first 6 months of life"
>6 months of age

But exposure started at:
"Hg exposure for each child was defined according to the num-ber of DTP/DT doses received at 3 months (93 days) and 4 months"

So if an exposed child, had instant effect, it got excluded.
Nice.


>https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24814559/

Studies of interest N=1112
After exclusion criteria established: N=10

Also admission to lack of data to form an actuall opinion on safety:
"Studies were included that
looked at either MMR vaccination, cumulative mercury (Hg) or
cumulative thimerosal dosage from vaccinations to ensure all proposed causes of ASD or regression were investigated. Outcome
measures included development of any condition on the autistic
spectrum as well as those specifically looking at regressive phenotype. Papers that recruited their cohort of participants solely from
the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) in the United
States were not included due to its many limitations and high risk
of bias including unverified reports, underreporting, inconsistent
data quality, absence of an unvaccinated control group and many
reports being filed in connection with litigation"

>https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32378703/
Looks only at preggos vaccinated with mercury.
Excluded if children were deformed or otherwise retarded.