/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10447384
>Let's say you wanted to learn how to do isomorphic transformations for your graph theory class.
A trivially insulting example for a trivially auto-insulting question. Here's a card I made long long ago that I can recall with perfect fidelity along with the hundreds of other graph theory cards I have perfect recall of. The daily cost of maintaining this perfect recall is seconds.
Everytime I see a card I haven't seen for a while (years these days), I gain some new insight and I Anki that. These insights build on each other until I thoroughly outgrow the source material on my own inductions. I guarantee you I have a more intuitive grasp of Graph Theory than you do, I guarantee you I can recognize and solve problems faster than you can, I guarantee you I if you were my TA I would have you in tears at your own inadequacy.
You bore me. Implying graph theory is some sort of "higher maths" is a joke. My suggestion is stop being so stuck up your own ass and try something new. I'm done with this conversation.