[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.16148118 [View]
File: 50 KB, 657x527, 1093047060225.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16148118

>>16148014
They're bald so they have to compensate by being scifi smart

this is the truth everybody knows this

>> No.15973666 [View]
File: 50 KB, 657x527, 1704299413167710.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15973666

Riddle me this, evolutionists:
Why did natural selection lead to an almost equal distribution between male and female births (in fact even favoring male births slightly), when for efficient reproduction (and thus survival) a distribution like 9:1 women to men would be much more successful. Just think about it, a man can impregnate women left and right, but a woman is out for a year once she got impregnated. If species survival would be optimized we would want more females that leads in turn to much higher reproductive rates.
It's almost as if there was a creator who ordained polyarmory to be a sin and thus ensured there would always be a man for a woman united in matrimony.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]