/sci/ - Science & Math

>>2004513
...um...[citation needed]?

Also, let's assume that despite fagtacularity, you recognize the need to reproduce and do so. (even if only to produce more boys to molest, 'fresh meat' if you will)

Perhaps you develop clay dildos and have an impetus to develop leatherworking and metallurgy to improve S&M sessions?

[This is me desperately trying to keep the thread on track]

>>1987314
All the failures you mention are multi-billion dollar projects. Given your obvious neglect of the concept of insurance I'll assume you are, in fact, genuinely surprised that a single engineer is paid billions per project.

>>1987342
Also given your obliviousness to how many steps there are between the engineer's design and the contractor's construction, I'll assume you are genuinely surprised to discover that in most technological disasters, the engineer's specifications were ignored that the contractor (usually a technician, not an engineer) might cut costs or time.

Your tenuous grasp of the basics of rudimentary sarcasm is clearly leaps and bounds ahead of your knowledge of the design and manufacture process, might I recommend you watch some Jewish comedians that you might at least be proficient at something.

>>1987355
Engineers are the equivalent of an adult who sells an adult, paying customer a loaded gun, and is absolved of all responsibility because he warned the buyer of it's dangers.

>>1851337
You made my day, OP.

>>1851350
and you have smashing eyes.

...because Free Testosterone kills hair cells?

That depends. Can I calibrate it to eliminate specific forms of stupidity, or just some vague, worrying definition of the term?

I've heard of Carlin, but never heard any of his routine.
Is he really that good?

Well, if you lean forward you could probably hold a whole bunch on your back.
In that case, the maximum number would be affected by the size of the person