/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15173637
>Why do you think square root of 2 is undefined?
Because you keep saying "Square root of two" instead of posting the actual quantity. Also it's irrational, so even if it's not "undefined" it's still not a number and therefore math cannot quantify it.

>Is it because you failed high school math?
No it's because I'm respecting math by respecting the quantities and properties of numbers that math relies on to..well do math. It is you who shits on it by implying it is anything other than "undefined". A know unknown.

>>15173749
what is it about incommensurable magnitudes that makes it the number one most popular mathematics topic of discussion amongst the mundane?
is it the comic bookish aspects of the irrational, undefined and completely known unknown "measures" which go along with the topic that makes quantifying them so popular amongst the scientist posers and materialists?

>>15044855
>lmao. This is called telling on yourself, dimwit.
Go peddle you rehashed buddhism elsewhere Ramir.

>two oldest branches of mathematics.
>geometry
>math
So when you're done quantifying your incommesurable magnitude (you never will be), here's your next homework assignment. Then maybe on march 14th while you're still pounding away at the calculator I'll come drop by with one of my coffee mug stains and we can quantify that shape.

>>14979971
> configure x type of matter
BECAUSE IT'S TORPID AND DOES NOTHING OF ITS OWN ACCORD.
> no consciousness
"NO U"
> configure y type of matter
SO TELL ME THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN "X" AND "y" MATTER WHEN ULTIMATELY THOSE ARE JUST GEOMETRICAL CONFIGURATIONS OF FIELDS.
> "BUT ITS NOT THE MATTER"
It's the configuration

>>14978498
>Poor cell service.
More like
>I really hope ISIS doesn't break my phone!
Good luck

>>14978745
>My spoke (typed) descriptions are the verbal mathematics
Lol

>since the ACTUAL mathematics is clearly waaay beyond you.
Meanwhile in reality, math can't even quantify your gay little pentagram let alone the hypotenuse of a simple triangle. Yet you think you will with words equated to math?

Lol, lmao even.

>Which way do you learn?
I was wise enough to understand a symbol isn't a quantity. You will never think yourself out of a box you thought yourself into.

>>14872598
>There is no "key to the universe"
Yes, that is specifically what this pentagram implies.

>You're just playing gradeschool geometry games
Despite these "games" being played, it didn't stop the coping mechanism you call "math" to try (and fail) at explaining them.