[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.15206793 [View]
File: 29 KB, 649x477, radiative-forcings-graph.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15206793

>>15206733
There's no confusion evident in his post. Solar forcing is negligible over this time period.

>> No.10015904 [View]
File: 29 KB, 649x477, radiative forcings since 1880.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10015904

>>10015884
By how much though? If you actually do the math, the variability in the sun's output is a very very small fraction of the output and not significant over the time scale of observed global warming.

>> No.9506840 [View]
File: 29 KB, 649x477, radiative forcings since 1880.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9506840

>>9506829

>> No.9420780 [View]
File: 29 KB, 649x477, radiative forcings since 1880.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9420780

>>9419919
>That means that a linear (or greater) temperature increase can not be explained by anthropogenic CO2 and other GHGs.
Wrong.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]