/sci/ - Science & Math

Just got accepted into Grad school for Mathematics.

How do you dress like a mathematician?

>>4368494
>Nobody knows

Tens of thousands of physicist would disagree with you. That shit is pretty well known. The problem I see here is that "anon" hasnt really expressed his question is a "valid scientific form".

He asks "why". Answers to "Why" questions requires some prior knowledge to understand, aka, you are trying to understand "a" in terms of "b". Anon made it clear what "a" is, but not "b". Hence until he says what "b" is his question is meaningless.

This basically applies to all "why" questions. For many "why" questions, "b" can be inferred from context. However in science often cannot, especially not in fundemental physics.

>>4211169
It is neat that you are thinking about the universe and connections between fundemental concepts. Keep up the "thinking".

However, there is already a shit-ton of work on issues like this. We already have a shit ton of known relations between fundemental concepts, ACTUAL SHIT PROVEN BY ACTUAL PHYSICISTS. There exists a tons of very "deep" math/physics that connects most fundemental ideas together.

"Time" isn't derived from energy, it is more like the otherway around. Energy is a concept we use because of its unique relationship with time (there are actual well established eqautions for this already). Homogenioty of time leads to conservation of energy (and visa versa).

You really need to know more physics to understand this shit, and make "credible theories" for yourself. Without knowing all the shit we already know, the chances that you can start from scratch, recreate everything we know (or at least not contradict it), and then your own theories, are slim to none. Physics has progressed so much, that you need to stand on the shoulders of giants to have any chance at discovering anything new.

Good luck.

>>3277141
>>3277141

Solid state?
If I wanted to be a fag I would have studied engineering.

>>3148426
Probably some weird states of quark matter.

That is usually what forms when you compress alot of matter into a very small space (before the black hole limit).

Well thanks for the questions /sci/, but I gtg.
Sorry for those I didnt get around to answering, maybe later.

Also, the board has turned to mostly shit. wtf happpened?

>>2373075
Group Theory, Calculus of Variations, Linear Algebra, just to name a few.

Of couse, you need the shitty lower level engineerg math as well. But anyone can learn Cal's, Difff eq, etc.

>>2265012
Thanks for the pic

>>2174832
>>2174791

Not even gonna watch that shit.

Bye Nye isnt a scientist, he is a homosexual, he only has a undergrad in mech engineering.
His word and opinions mean JACK SHIT!

>>2152309
>The mathematical structure of Electromagnetism and Gravity are analgous for some systems

>Please rephrase your question to make sense

>Yes, there are laws for all the forces

>Fantasy, no mainstream theory supports the idea of Tachyons. It is just sci-fi idea.

>You won't swallow his cum?

>Computers that work off the principles of QM

>It is clear that this is over your head

\thread

>>1746988
"Engineers ar FAGGOTS" - D.Hilbert

>>1732356

1) Why are they waves?

They are not waves, they are not anything. It is a system with inherit properties, you can choose to see it anyway you want. You observe the system and note that it can be described with the mathematics of waves very accurlt. Hence Waves.

2) How are they Waves?

Again they are not waves, it is just a "system". We choose to describe them as waves becuase they way they function matches the mathematical model of a quantum wave theory.

Do you have any real questions? Or just more phil bullshit?

>>1245722
I heard its a good field. I really dont have much experience with it though. I took a couple of medical physics courses before, but I dont think those are the same.

In any case, biophysics is one of the most growing physics fields, also pays very well.
Good Luck!

>>1161844
I am mathematican
ALL YOUR BASE BELONG TO US!