/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14948908
viruses literally don't exist
I'm not joking, there's literally no such thing as a virus
that entire farce started with the fraudulent origins of the so-called tobacco mosaic virus (TMV), whereby they'd give the tobacco plants a poisonous cocktail purportedly containing a "virus" from dead plants that was supposedly making them die, which promptly caused them to die, and then they'd make the same poisonous cocktail with those plants in turn
then they compared this to "control", which was a healthy plant not exposed to anything, and said "ta-dah, it's a virus"
in reality, no actual control was ever done, and never has been in the entire fraudulent field of "virology" ever, because an actual control would be to give plants the same poisonous cocktail but without the alleged "virus", and anyone who does this will immediately see the obvious: the plants die anyway, because there is no "virus", it's a poisonous cocktail that murders the plant
imagine if you were to shoot someone in the head with a bullet that supposedly has a "virus" on it, and then compare the result to a person you don't shoot at all, of course you'd find that the "virus" kills the man
the only problem is that an actual control there would be to shoot a man with a regular bullet that doesn't have the "virus" on it, and of course he'd die too
everything since then has just been trying to blame a wide variety of symptoms resulting from people consuming toxic garbage and being exposed to toxic environments on such "viruses", constructing more and more sophisticated methods to fraudulently make the claims they do, such as e.g. using PCR to construct pretty much any sequence they want out of anything
it's like me bombing your house to pieces, constructing a huge donkey statue out of the pieces, and then loudly proclaiming that there was a donkey statue in your house all along (and also that it was responsible for blowing up your house)
totally ridiculous, a farce beyond comprehension