/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8754784
>it was because government regulates who can be in energy and they handed monopoly power to them.
literally making shit up again, are we?

Enron's (fraudulent) boom and (inevitable) bust came in the wake of massive DEREGULATION of the energy industry. and at NO POINT did they enjoy anything CLOSE to a monopoly.

this is the problem with you /pol/acks; facts and history must be reshaped to fit your narrative, which you happily do because you're so damn disconnected from reality.

>>8515764
I love how that list starts with a long list of arguments against it that the authors don't like.

>not all these papers actually reject AGW...
>>that's a STRAWMAN ARGUMENT!
>not all these papers are PhySci papers
>>STRAWMAN
>not all these papers are peer-reviewed
>>STRAWMAN
>some of these papers actually explicitly support AGW...
>>STRAWMAN
>some of these papers directly contradict other papers on this list
>>STRAWMAN

basically just imagine a scientist giving a long presentation on a technical subject while Donald Trump shouts "WRONG" every third word and you've about got the tone of it.