[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:

View post   
>> No.9738864 [View]
File: 78 KB, 1300x863, 10471559-Puzzled-man-at-computer-shrugs-shoulders-and-expresses-lack-of-knowledge-Stock-Photo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9738864

>>9738849
>imfigany minum one

>> No.9592828 [View]
File: 78 KB, 1300x863, 10471559-Puzzled-man-at-computer-shrugs-shoulders-and-expresses-lack-of-knowledge-Stock-Photo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9592828

>>9592822

>> No.9444882 [View]
File: 78 KB, 1300x863, 10471559-Puzzled-man-at-computer-shrugs-shoulders-and-expresses-lack-of-knowledge-Stock-Photo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9444882

[math]\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{x}{(x+1)^n} < \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{(x+1)}{(x+2)^n}[/math] for every partial sum.
There are truly an infinite amount of unique numbers that are read as "0.999..." and they all have relative greater than or less than values compared to each other.

[math]0.\bar{9} < 0.\bar{9} < 0.\bar{9} < 0.\bar{9} < ... < 1[/math]

I mean, if you believe infinity is a valid concept and it's usage in mathematics doesn't need to be corrected, you'll just have to live with the fact that [math]0.\bar{9} \neq 0.\bar{9}[/math], as prescribed by infinite property.

>> No.9394718 [View]
File: 78 KB, 1300x863, 10471559-Puzzled-man-at-computer-shrugs-shoulders-and-expresses-lack-of-knowledge-Stock-Photo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9394718

>>9394705
Everything I've posted is proof. You are just being stubborn.

>> No.9388008 [View]
File: 78 KB, 1300x863, 10471559-Puzzled-man-at-computer-shrugs-shoulders-and-expresses-lack-of-knowledge-Stock-Photo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9388008

>>9387995
Better start plotting vectors

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]