/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15181489
>literature agrees
Not at all though that’s just a flat earth earther tier argument that unless you personally don’t perform a measurement then it’s automatically false
Just of the top of my head ice firn does indeed accurately record both atmospheric composition and temperature overlapping with in situ instrument readings. Coral proxies which are sub monthly resolution also agree with in situ measurements.
You’re just stating that they’re wrong from ignorance about proxy methodology.
As for the instrumental record it’s again a statement that they’re wrong even though their methodology and uncertainty are clearly stated across all of the research groups that have worked on them even those independent ones that were made by climate skeptics that agreed with ERSST and HADCRUT