/sci/ - Science & Math

>>2846670
This is positive eugenics though. I'm not preventing those I see as less fit from reproducing, nor am I even seeking to out-compete them. It's more akin to selective breeding

>>2846673
Trollolol, 1/10 I almost started to write a response.

>>2846671
>>2846663
You don't feel a moral, if not biological, responsibility to pass on your genes, given that you are intelligent? In fact the purpose of life, striped of metaphysical bullshit, is nothing but to reproduce.

If intelligent people fail to do this sufficiently it'll be a detriment to the human race.