/sci/ - Science & Math

>>3471737

Because they don't in the context of the Free Will argument.

>>3471731

off topic again.

You guys are a pest and the reason one can not have a good discussion.

"Hey guys lets talk about how much sense the death penatly _according to utilitarianism_ makes!"

"lol the consequences of actions don't matter for the following reasons..."

>>3344329
>there is nothing which gives you the right to ask someone in a SPACE WHICH THEY CANNOT ESCAPE on a date.

So you are saying the man broke the law. Which law?

>I don't think you realize how uncomfortable...

No. The point is that I do not care. SHE is the one who is projecting danger where there is none and therefore it is HER problem.

See this for a good analogy >3344254

>>3260898

Ok lets say I know that somebody is about to murder my neighbour and I could call the police but I don't...am I not partially responsible for letting it happen.

Let's then say the criminal is part of an organization that protects him and he is free to murder more people. I happen to buy bananas that this organization sells. I know about them protecting murderers and that they do it partially with my money. Yet I keep buying their bananas.

You saying I would be totally guiltless then?

>>3109642

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ASBBIVFb8c&feature=player_embedded

Aliens, no matter how advanced, evolved in the universe. They aren't eternal, didn't create everything ex nihilo and have no reason to care about human homosexes.

Consider yourself debunked, OP.