/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8668973
>>the supposed correlation between your evidence and prediction don't match reality
>>predictions are not real
>here's where the denier argument falls apart; they ASSUME that models don't accurately describe what's going on, when that's not really true

Ah yes, they're so accurate.

>>8566331
>>>8566243
>Can't provide a single piece of evidence that "most" projections are wrong? That's what I thought.

What's this? A draft graph from the UN IPCC pre-final draft. Projections so wrong, that the U.N. IPCC took them out of the final product and replaced it with a graph where they add much more variability to the "projections" guaranteeing unfalsifiability.

>nb4 "John Crook" said that graph is centered wrong.
Again, a bald faced lie. Look at the graph here from the actual IPCC report:
>>8566646
It starts at the same place.