/sci/ - Science & Math

26/?

>>9135649
oh reich? orgone aka anti entropy aka life force? fucking kek literally einstein agreed to repeat his experiments and critiqued reich's experimental rigor. orgone was thrown away with the luminous aether in the early 20th century dude it's people like you that lack a scientific detachment to your claims and keep shit like this popping back up when it was laid to rest a fucking century ago.

>>8990758
>her

>double major
>two hard sciences
>at a university so infamously grueling it's known as "where fun goes to die"
>while battling an undiagnosed anxiety disorder
>in four years
come at me bro.

>Lord Kelvin once said "heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible"
>we can't say "AND I SUPPOSE WE'LL SEND MEN TO THE MOON" as a sarcastic remark even though it was used extensively before Apollo 11
>we can cure cancer
>we can 3D print almost anything
>we'd still be using vacuum tubes if it weren't for 2 stubborn physicists
>
>
>
>
>"fusion is a meme"
who ever says this were raped by their father and got a D in Calc 2

>>8710499
Yes,Yes I did anon , fuck I didn't know you'll notice

my shitposting skills are so shit that I have to copy posts in order to get (yous)

>>8700759
She helped me pass Calc II after I had been out of school for two years. She has been the only attractive woman who has successfully taught me anything. Hope she puts out some new stuff for linear algebra or elementary diff eq's.

>>8681043
Kinda misleading
They're not exactly tough if you can easily recognize patterns, but most people make some small mistakes or caveats which leads them to a wrong answer.

>>8680965
I recommend doing AP FRQs at least 2 or 3 times a week and really drill in Integration techniques into your skull. Use Paul's Online Math Notes when you're stuck and just practice.
Some things you should know is that there will always be a Riemann sum FRQ (AB question) and a Series/Sequences FRQ
60% of the test is still AB content, so you can still get credit for a year in Calculus even if you fail the BC section.
The test will be relatively easy if you just do these few things. You can certainly get a 5 my dude.

>>8641849
>>8641870
Christ...

>>8636786
>implying

>>8632552
>It was in preparation. He finished it. Douche-bag.
Are you ACTUALLY this retarded?
In Happer's correspondence with the Greenpeace agents, he attached a copy of a paper he had already written as a sample of his work. He then offered to write an entirely different paper tailored to the requests of the fictitious company.

>I hope I understand what you mean by "project." What I thought you meant was writing something like the white paper or the regulatory testimony, copies of which I attach again for clarity....Depending on how extensive a document you have in mind, the time required or cost could be more of less, but I hope this gives you some idea of what I would expect if we were to proceed on some mutually agreeable course.

>>you are totally correct in your understanding of the project - we are looking for a short paper that makes the case for the benefits of CO2 from fossil fuels in my client’s region.

>I would be glad to ask for a similar review for the first drafts of anything I write for your client.

>https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2642410-Email-Chain-Happer-O-Keefe-and-Donors-Trust.html

As usual, the denier is eager to make shit up if he thinks it will help his argument. Just like when >>8630210 (was that you, or just your buddy?) decided that human CO2 emissions must be negligible compared to what a supervolcano would put out...and was wrong from bottom to top. This sort of shit is why it's important to stick to the facts and not just lie like a rug; eventually, you're found out.

>>8622547
you fucking moron
do you know what similarity is?

all squares have the same ratio of perimeter to radius even if the squares have different radii or perimeters. The ratio of perimeter to radius for a square is 4*sqrt(2)
that's the story for all regular n-gons: there is some unique number for that n-gon which is the ratio of its perimeter to radius
A circle is just a regular infinity-gon. You can't actually draw an infinity-gon in the physical universe, but you can mathematically approximate the ratio of its perimeter to its radius and the answer is 2*pi
It's not a fucking inference, it's an observation, because you can "observe" how the ratio from perimeter to radius changes as you increase the number of sides

>>8610179
This, why did they even add a report button.

>>8568607
I can understand why this would be hard for someone who never went to college.
If you don't like any of those things I recommend you move to country that doesn't have any of those. These countries include
-All of Africa
-All of South and middle America
-Most of Asia including India, China, and Russia
Alternately you can visit counties that have these things and see how they turned out. These include
-All of Europe
-Canada
-The USA for the past sixty years
Please if that's what you want it's out there, go get it.

after a year of not taking any amphetamines, I just took 50mg of vyvance an hour ago

AMA

>>8538512
watts = amperes * volts.
Joules = watts per seconds.
Therefore amps * volts * 3600 = joules.
Its a measure of energy not a rate.

>>8535181
Are you kidding me? This is one of the nicest boards on 4chan. You can't complain about a test grade without five comments telling you to keep trying and everything's going to be okay,and then they'll try to help you with your math homework. Go back to /b/ if you want pages of deaththreats.

ah yes, my favorite

>>8444159
>relativistic invariance
>not elegant
baka desu senpai

Hey, /sci/. I recently came across a video in which (at least based on what I understood) this man argues that the square root of 2 is not a real number. Perhaps I understood incorrectly, but is there any truth to this? It seems that there are others that support this idea.

And don't bother watching the entire thing, a little before 13:00 is when he makes the claim.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=REeaT2mWj6Y&t=1446s

>are you afraid of a theoretical construction based on an incomplete knowledge of physics
no