/sci/ - Science & Math

>>3468587
Well sir, as a practiced scientist, when face with an irrational object that behaves insignificantly different than random noise, I have two choices:

1. Pretend it makes sense and sell it to cultists
2. Ignore it.

Just because I keep responding to your derp, doesn't mean you're winning anything but an imaginary war where your reality is localized around what can only be considered a self interested and masterful delusion.

This level of derp is considered to be a mere figment of reality, and it is indistinguishable from other beliefs such as god, singularities and FTL.

What you're observing, naturally, is an affront to what is considered honest debate and it happens because there is no unnatural way to try to persuade someone who has fallen down a semantic hole.

These semantic holes are commonly found by people with an obsessive attention to detail in abstract concepts. As they constantly break down an abstract reality, they believe that they are some how getting to the real 'truth'.

Except, that real truth is concretely elusive, because it is an abstraction of abstraction. It is as if they are increasingly magnifying a mandel brot set, and at some arbitrary level of magnification, they declare that they know the truth.

>good luck with that, aspie.

>>3212561
trolling is a fractal dimension problem of poe's law

>>3165476
>Fractal expansion of poe's law, gets every scientist, every time.

How long is 1 hour in lifetimes for you? Have you tried to quantify before?

1 lifetime is the amount of life you have now + a small fraction dedicated to the time of death that ever decreases and tries to reach 0 (or maybe that's the wrong way of doing it?).

An hour in lifetimes can factor in different ways depending on your environment and personal interpretation of "relative" time.

ex. 1 hour = .0000006 LT if LT = 1.5 (current lifetime + expected age of death. The longer the age of death is expected, the shorter the lifetime).

Pure objective beauty.