/sci/ - Science & Math

>>7007202
>but the fact that you can't draw any lines between grammar and the fundaments of math.

Formal grammars have been known for a long time. However this has absolutely nothing to do with your idiotic and childish philosodrivel. Have you tried reading the wikipedia page about grammar?

>>6947995
Kant was debunked during his own lifetime. Literally everything he wrote was wrong. His conception of spacetime was fundamentally flawed, his "thing-in-itself" was purest meaningless fedoratarded wankery. His misuses of the wod "noumenon" was a disgusting display of autism. His deontological ethics is so fucked up that every child can see why it's never applicable.

Popper is devoid of intellectual merit. Falsification has been used long before him. It would be not just naive, but even outright retarded, to claim that Popper invented falsification. As if scientists before him kept believing in experimentally falsified theories... Popper, Kuhn etc - all the philosophers of science are merely resembling infants who are overly proud of finally verbalizing trivialities for the first time which everyone else already knew and used every day.

liek this on