/sci/ - Science & Math

>did calc 3 online
>tests were all multiple choice
>got approved by cheating my way in with symbolic manipulators and monte-carloing all integrals

Calculus is gay and physicucks are faggots lmaaaaaaaaaaao

>>10110365
first you say that there are no good studies with actual control groups.
then I show you some cited in the report you yourself linked to.
then you try to bring up two completely different documents, one of which is a PACKAGE INSERT (lmao, did you think it was a study?) and one of which is a fairly garbage study (1057 subjects, 27 total deaths, no categorization of cause of death, in a fucking MORTALITY STUDY).

kinda sounds like you're trying to distract from how you got caught in a hilariously sloppy lie.
keep fucking that chicken, anon. :^)

>>8761084
>denier posts autismal conspiracy theories
>gets ridiculed
>denier makes anecdotal claim about how it's SUPER COLD where he lives
>gets ignored
>denier misrepresents scientific literature to claim that we just can't be sure we're causing warming
>gets rebutted with arguments backed up by specific references to said literature

I just got a beer from the fridge, and it was way cold. Global warming my arse

"There are no real rules about moderation either - enjoy your ban"

>post deleted for violating board rules
>reposts exact same shit once b& expires
>throws hissy fit about MUH CENSORSHIP
btw who are you quoting?

>>8606896
>I have concerns which I don't feel the "ENORMOUS body of evidence" (no need to shout) has satisfactorily explored
the problem is, your "feel[ing]" that the evidence doesn't address those concerns isn't rooted in fact. the CDC runs a reporting system for possible adverse effects of vaccination, called VAERS. there have been plenty of analyses of the information collected, finding essentially that serious adverse reactions are rare (less than 0.0016%, or about 1/62000). And this overestimates the prevalence, since illnesses that coincidentally occur within a few days of vaccination are reported in the system as well. Between 1991 and 2001, nearly 2 billion doses of vaccines were administered in the USA, and there is exactly ONE death attributable to an adverse reaction.
To put this in perspective, you are about as likely to have a severe reaction to a vaccination as you are to survive a rabies infection without timely administration of the vaccine. You are more likely to be President of the United States than to die from a bad reaction to a vaccine.
>https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5201a1.htm

>>8508768
how about we add 1 molecule of strychnine to each 10,000 molecules in your body and see how you like it.

>>8509091
>The body of evidence for AGW is entirely simulation and synthetic. Based entirely on projection.
...apart from all the measurements showing that the Earth is actually warming due to an intensified greenhouse effect.

>you admit the earth is cooling yet this has no effect on the climate
blaming the slow cooling of the Earth for climate change at the surface is like blaming the heat death of the universe for your room being messy. the scales aren't REMOTELY comparable.
I mean, you're dead wrong about glaciation increasing over geologic history; there's no clear trend, and the Earth just oscillates irregularly between hothouse and icehouse states. But even leaving those facts aside, how long do you think it takes for the surface to cool by 1 K as a result of the Earth's core cooling? Let's hear your number on that one. (spoileralert: your claims on this matter are inconsistent with the evidence for liquid water at the surface of the Earth during the post-Hadean.)

>wtf are you even talking about?
he's saying that because the forcings driving current warming are different from those responsible for past climatic cycles, the current warming may be unidirectional rather than cyclical. even in broken English, it's not hard to understand, you brainlet.

>a geologist told me to fuck off
>that was mean
>[salt]
this other geoscientist figures you can fuck all the way off also.