/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10665904
>Only co2 at 10,000 thicker concentrations than in our air can be shown to significantly raise the temp of an environment
Where do people get this wrong information from and then think they are an expert?

Another Vostok ice core chart clearly shows that CO2 concentration typically lags temperature in nature, and not the reverse.
If CO2 were as potent a greenhouse gas as the IPCC would have you believe, this in and of itself would have set the Earth on the path to runaway warming long before humanity ever emerged to worry over it - Temperature goes up -> CO2 is released -> Temperature continues to climb -> repeat ad infinitum. Clearly this has not been the case.

>>10087612
Another Vostok ice core chart clearly shows that CO2 concentration typically lags temperature in nature, and not the reverse.
If CO2 were as potent a greenhouse gas as the IPCC would have you believe, this in and of itself would have set the Earth on the path to runaway warming long before humanity ever emerged to worry over it - Temperature goes up -> CO2 is released -> Temperature continues to climb -> repeat ad infinitum. Clearly this has not been the case.