/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9252780
>Now this may be too complicated for a brainlet such as yourself, but you look at the predictions made 20 years ago about the warming we would see today, , and compare them to the actual warming we have seen.
Yes! Let's do that and see exactly how misinformed you are:

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/climate-model-projections-compared-to-observations/

>If you do this, you'll note the vast majority were very far from the truth, almost all entirely predicting a HIGHER warming than we've seen.
This is pure fantasy, you know you're making this up because you have no data. Pathetic.

>Climate is chaotic because it is a large set of nonlinear differential equations, which in general don't have close formed solutions.
Again you confuse weather for climate. What are the differential equations of the climate? The weather is modeled with fluid dynamics, the climate is not. Again, you are just making shit up. Not to mention that solving PDEs is unnecessary since practical models will just approximate their solutions.

>I would say you're projecting
Anyone can see you're lying about basic facts.

>>8868640
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2007/05/hansens-1988-projections/