/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11455923
I am content with this but to my experience and knowledge the one that satisfies both criteria is usually the one blasted at full volume at innocent bystanders.

Is there anything that can avoid this? Keen to be proven as holding an opinion that helps/satisfies nobody, even if it is so I can let go of it and stop burning my own hand with this word 'integrity'.

>Just to add to the image: I have never seen anyone's values include me beyond satisfying their emotional/spiritual masturbation story. If it doesn't become an orgy of inclusion ultimately, no matter how distasteful that may appear at first impression, then why bother? The more the merrier.