[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.11273901 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 27 KB, 396x222, 43714e6c85f7e7019777027ecaad71fe4edcaeac.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11273901

>persian
WW3 incoming

>> No.11064312 [View]
File: 27 KB, 396x222, 43714e6c85f7e7019777027ecaad71fe4edcaeac.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11064312

Is 74 Numberwang™?

>> No.11062679 [View]
File: 27 KB, 396x222, 43714e6c85f7e7019777027ecaad71fe4edcaeac.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11062679

Is 7418955 Numberwang™?
I'm trying to solve it
7418955 * 7.8 = 57867849
Using Wolfram, I get that the integral from x=0 to 57867849 of |sqrt(x/15777)sin(x/10000)| is 5.1 * 10^7.
That's 51 million.
£51 million for active travel infrastructure in 2019
https://www.gov.scot/news/gbp-51-million-for-active-travel-infrastructure-in-2019/
From the article :"Edinburgh now seeing rates of cycling at 9.8%"
9.8% = 0.098. Times it by a thousand to get 98. Now we know that 100 = 98+ 2, and we know that 100 is Numberwang™.
So does this show that 7418955 is Numberwang™? Or did I miss a step in this proof?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]