/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15600810
I swear to god
>a new kind of X with unusual physics
we've already been through this

What happened?

Where are all those shills who said the Emdrive wasn't real? Funny how they've all gone silent now.

We should be learning to develop the principle of the emdrive thruster.

Basically it involves sending electromagnetic waves through empty space and then using electric currents within these travelling fields to achieve thrust by Ampere's force law. One should be able to do this with two coils in close proximity and some very fast switching, The overall effect is that of pushing back against spacetime itself.

https://neolegesmotus.com/2017/02/22/how-to-violate-newtons-third-asps-early-method/

>>10400300
It was cutting-age military tech a century ago, and 50 years back it was still good enough to send us to the moon. However it was a very inefficient method, often requiring as much fuel as payload just to get into orbit. Luckily science has since moved on.

If NASA wants to see thrust they should come to my bedroom when I’m boning my girlfriend

How fucking cool would that have been though?

Can someone tell me the status of the EM Drive testing? I know it is controversial but the NASA Space Flight Forums aren't interesting anymore, kind of died since larger companies/countries got more serious about testing.

What are your thoughts on it?

>>9445532
conservation of momentum

well?

Is the EM Drive bullshit or not?

Is it for real

How many times are labs gonna report "equipment failure" before we except its for real?

>put EM drive in space
>attach to top of stick
>put other end of stick on to generator
>turn on EM drive
>no more power problems

did it work?

So whatever happened to this thing? Was it confirmed? Debunked as fake?

I haven't heard anything lately at all.

What happened to it?

this is the key
conservation of momentum BTFO

But what if it's real...

How pic related works?

this fucking copper cone singhandedly proved that scientists are fucking polarized sheep that can't into unbiased review. jesus christ how pathetic can you be to blindly say it either breaks physics, or that the data is wrong? this is a key opportunity for science to shine but instead we get nothing but shitposts and memes. i hope all you shitters die for not taking this from a logical, empirical standpoint and looked at the data with a proper conclusion that didn't perversely adhere to the popular belief of whatever camp you're from. i can't talk about this seriously with anyone anymore. modern science discussion is on the same level as municipal politics.

yes

>>8475019

>b-b-but muh laws! muh conservation of energy!

when will you poindexter nerds admit that your equations are just wrong?

ITT: post reactionless drive and gravity manipulation ideas that may or may not turn out to work but none proven already not to. I'll start:
Albecurrie Drive
EM Drive

>>7404627
Just slap one of these bad boys on the back of your car and you're on your way out to pluto in no time