/sci/ - Science & Math

>>5210274
most engineers I would say have a good fundamental understanding in regards to the conceptualization of the problem/system at hand.
>Without Engineering, Scientists wouldn't be able to do their fancy shmangled experiments to come up with new theories. (LHC is not possible without engineers helping, nor the Manhattan Project). You don't need the smartest monkey, just a team of monkeys who at least know the ground rules and understand the feasibility of the task at hand.
Engineers and Scientists are both equally important in the continuing development of our world.

>>5174258
just talk to them. THEY ARE HUMANS. QUIT putting them on some pedastal. They go through the same shit we do. Insecurites, doubts, all that shit. Just do your best effort to strike up an interesting conversation. YOU WILL probably fail you're first times since most people learn how to do this in the 9th grade, but the more you try the better you get. Like learning a new subject, practice makes perfect. The more you actively try and hit on them FACE TO FACE not over FACEBOOK the BETTER you will get. And when you can do it and make it look like she isn't special and you're just talking, it automatically makes you're worth go up to them, since you're not being a beta whos acting like she's already to good for you. Why would she wan't to be with someone who doesn't even show self worth in the small things? She wouldn't

>not being member of global zionist elite
>2012

Question!
Why do fluids travelling at super sonic speeds increase in velocity when they travel through spots of increasing area?
Like the reverse of a nozzle effect.
If you have trouble visualizing, think of a rocket engine where the fuel is being burned it converges tightly at the point it hits super sonic then opens back up to greater area to gain more thrust from the velocity increase, BUT WHY DOES IT DO THIS!!?!?!?!

There are double the number of men with an IQ over 130 than women. Women's average IQ is also about 5 points lower.

Hardly any brilliant human has been, or will ever be, a woman. Women are statistically closer, with a far lower standard deviation. '

That's the indisputable science of the matter. End of thread. Thread over. Thread closed. Unless anyone wants citations, I can provide many.

It simply has to do with the the fact that we don't actually employ our brain's resources in reading every single letter and every single word, or at least for proficient readers, but instead we process phrases and just go by what we expect to read.

>>3575668
Aww, there there. At least your father gave you his attention.

>>3494676
>The free-market forced them with their profit incentive
>free market forced them

I actually laughed out loud at that one.

In a free market banks are restrained by how much money they have, and they use this as a signal to find out how much money they can loan out without losing money or going bankrupt. If the government gives them massive amounts of money then the signal is distorted and they can give out as many loans as they'd like. This creates a bubble.

Deregulation in a free market doesn't matter and is a good thing because the banks still won't loan out money they DO NOT HAVE.

Retard.

>>3297588

>resources have their limits

Who said? Theoretically, the energy content of the universe is static.

Given a sufficiently advanced civilization, I don't see why we should be worried about resources in the sense of COMPLETE exhaustion.

>>3043790
>>3043792
>>3043794

>mfw
I'm /fit/ and /sci/
>mfw
I realize /fit/ is the biggest homo board on 4chan other than a select few like /a/ or /soc/
>mfw
NOTforeveralone.jpeg

>>2729898
>>2729901
whenever you two "geniuses" come up with a way have perpetual motion or energy, I'll believe in you both. Mathematicians are so silly.