/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15890608
Interesting corollary result regarding the fundamental problem of quantum field theory: why do we have the standard model particles and not some other particles?

>>12778460
>my prediction for spin-1.

I am the anonymous physicist featured in the black hole article yesterday.
https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/ukbz6/i_am_the_anonymous_physicist_featured_in_the/

https://justpaste.me/EWWg1

One of my experimental predictions was that the particle CERN found in 2012 would have spin-1, meaning that it's not a Higgs boson at all because those have spin-0 in any variant.

I also showed the vibrational spectrum of the lattice I constructed is EXACTLY the particle spectrum of the standard model. I also had a lot of other outrageously confirming results.

The other one of the top three most important ones.

>Can someone explain the standard model to me please?
After people invented quantum field theory, they couldn't get it to predict the fundamental particles they were seeing in experiments. So, in order to make the best use of quantum field theory, they built this model which adds to QFT all the stuff that got learned about fundamental particles over the years. If someone ever figures out why we have the fundamental particles that we have, then the standard model will go away and we will use the thing that explains the particles instead of the thing that supposes they are the ones we already saw. I call this problem "the fundamental problem of quantum field theory."

When they build QFT from the classical mattress problem, which is to model a continuous field as a large number of discrete oscillators such as a mattress made of springs, there is a pretty simple way to describe the photon as a vibration of the lattice. Pic related, I showed how all the possible types of vibrations in my cosmological lattice are exactly the same as the types of particles which are granted by the standard model (which reflects experiment.) So, in the future someone will build a 14D mattress and workout the spectrum of vibrations and then that will replace the standard model because i solved the fundamental problem of QFT in early 2013.

>>11996971
Same thing with CERN and the spin of the particle they found in 2012. They know it has spin-1 but they don't mention it. For it to be Higgs' particle, it would have to have spin-0 but my own theory says it should have spin-1. It's more important for CERN to support the satanic agenda off the piece of shit USA than it is or them to do anything else, such as to pursue the scientific communication objectives which the LHC was literally built to support.

Original paper.

Quantum Structure
https://vixra.org/abs/1302.0037

30 Tooker Papers
http://s000.tinyupload.com/index.php?file_id=08673880568874767256

>>11212618
http://s000.tinyupload.com/index.php?file_id=08673880568874767256

>>10944856
Yeah, how come none of you all noticed it during the 150 years when I wasn't working on it?