/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15967890
If your proof only works in one scenario and fails in all others then it's not applicable and can be thrown in the trash, sorry

>>15883072
It doesn't matter what colour it is, the point is that it is expressed in a specific way, to ask why is redundant, it's simply a law of nature
>>15883076
There is no hard problem of consciousness, the entire debate is purely philosophical, without physical reactions there is no consciousness, problem solved

>>15537218
I already blasted you out of the waters with several arguments and you've yet to provide any evidence for your claims besides "uhh it's just qualia bro it's self evident!!", I refuse to interact with you further until you educate yourself and come back with some better arguments, toodaloo dumbfuck!!

>>14950051
Absolutely noone writes like that irl outside of their diary and anyone can learn to write nice, there's an entire profession made just for that.

>>14737904
Yeah we already know the chinese exist, no I will not make disgusting insect children with them