/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15585513
Aforementioned expert magic. Somehow the adjustments are perfectly done to fit the increase in atmospheric CO2. I wonder why they would do that?

>>15568693
>STOP POINTING OUT THAT MY DOOMSDAY CULT IS FAULTY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>>15569916
>no when the data doesn’t fit my conclusions
The data perfectly fits my conclusions (no warming), which is why unethical liars have to change it before they make their doomsday proclamations.

>>15565707
Everywhere.

>>15565682

>>15558561
>It’s not.
If it's impossible then why do they do it?

>>15557323
If it was so self-evidently true, you wouldn't need to lie about the temperature. And yet lying about the temperature is what you do.

>>15556960
>Climate change supporters are going to claim that the IPCC has always said temperature has been rising. And that any claims of data tampering are lies.
And you can prove that they're lying quite easily, so you therefore must side with climate change skeptics.

>>15545188

>15458515
Must be hard working as a paid shill for the kike agenda, coming in here with your doomsday-cult bullshit and getting fucking humiliated and laughed at over and over again.

But at least the 2¢ per post pay is good, right?

Daily reminder that we have known for quite some time the "climate scientists" are outright fabricating their global temperature data.

This is a cult, and when reality does not match their belief system, they simply lie about reality.