/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8867965
>Bates claims that the paper was "rushed" to influence Paris 2015, but that is simply not the case and is not based in any EVIDENCE, you know, the same evidence that you apparently care so deeply about. Funny enough, climate change denial itself has no basis in the scientific literature or evidence either. For example, all the projections made by climate change deniers have been wrong, meanwhile the actual projections in the literature have proven to be quite robust compared to the observations:

You're not fooling anyone by trying to defend the indefensible. Adding bad data (data that was "corrected" to warmed ship intake data) is terrible science. Funny how they "lost" the exact data used for the "study."

You're an obvious shill buddy.

>>8720406
Trigger alert! Proof that its all about the money.

They want Billions and Trillions
http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2015/04/18/raising-trillions-for-climate-finance