/sci/ - Science & Math

>>2720622
Exactly we calculated black holes, neutron stars, pulsars, and white dwarfs existed with math even before we observed them. But we can't calculate an effective way to move faster than light that doesn't require more mass than the hole universe and more energy than the galaxy emits in a day. And most of those are latter proven to be bad math in the first place.

We could see fission tracks in uranium ore, we understood half life and radioactivity. With these we realized what fission is capable of, but we have never observed a particle exceed c in a vacuum. And we have never seen space fold into a tunnel.

We need data, we cannot make bricks without clay. Just making up bullshit and wish fulfillment won't cut it.

I just don't want to die, why is that so hard to ask for?

There's so much outside of our little ball of existence to learn about, to think that we'll never live to see the day...

>>2599897
oh
i got your "mother" right here

Sage for not posting the whole poem.
I happen to have it though.

OP here
Time for a poem.

how feasible is it to make robots which suck up moon regolith and poop out solar panels en masse (even if they're low efficiency)?

in addition, how feasible would it be to use some kind of plasticizer mixed with moon dust then extruded like toothpaste by a robot into dome shapes? (pressurized pueblos)

i saw both of these in some space program on science channel, i never found it again