[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.9985447 [View]
File: 94 KB, 864x405, 8ac137a9fb154e726353304249456dc7.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9985447

>>9985442
forgot image

>> No.9985431 [View]
File: 94 KB, 864x405, 8ac137a9fb154e726353304249456dc7.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9985431

How does this proof make any sense? How does he get that since [math]z[/math] is not a unit, then [math]z=z_1t[/math]?

I would have used the fact that R being Noetherian is equivalent to "any family of ideals has a maximal element", and used the "family of proper ideals" as the family in question and they hence are all contained in the unique maximal ideal since R is local. Since it is principal, then it must divide any non-unit element.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]