/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15333101
I ignored it because it was bullshit but in fact it's proof you've been straight up lying because the actual quote is "30 TWh (of wind capacity) by 2030" and it's not the total wind potential of Finland, dolt. Here is a study(marked as spam for some reason) which says that wind could provide all of the country's energy needs. Got any more non-arguments or are you finally done?
>waaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh solarfags refuted my dumbshit i hate dem so much