/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15599229
>Current peer reviewing is little more than typo checking.

Reviewing is much like being a janitor on 4chan. You do it for free, you provide free labour to publishers (Elsevier, SAGE, Springer, Taylor and Francis etc.), you had to sift through a bunch of nonsense and pick the least bad papers, you think you're contributing to great scientific discussion when in reality you're not, and at the end of the month you cry yourself to sleep alone in a dimly lit room after eating some hotpockets.