/sci/ - Science & Math

>>2319738
You seem to have a problem with basic logic, and assumtpions. You make the classical mistake of thinking like a common retard, and not a scientist.

Let me give you an example:
In 1940's there is no reason to assume we won't have anti-grav flying cars by 2000.

Most common folk, thought that it was a foresure thing. Surely we would develop some sort of anti-gravity by 2000, given the current rate of progress and general direction that society was going. However, scientists never said that shit!

2011 - NO ANTIGRAVITY

Retards jumping to fucking conclusions: 0
Level headed scientists: 1