/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15270984
>Right, so, now you've moved the goalpost even further to an even more limited niche that's even more ridiculous due to its ad hoc nature. I think I've well proved my point about how dishonest you are.

They and you are dishonest.
Vaccines are not effective against any disease.
They all cause problems with the same patterns, they should protect against:
>MMR vaccines should protect against Skin rashes and fever, commonly skin rashes (which they then call erythrema multiforme but expess exactly like mumps or measels and high fever


>Polio vaccine should protect against extremly rare brain inflamatory disease which can lead to paralysis
> causes neurological disease (rare) in neurological diseases such as flaccid myelitis, encephalopathy, menengitis which can lead to paralysis aswell "But it has not the label polio so its actually a good thing"

It's all memes and never effective.
It's all excuses to inject neurotoxins in children.
It's never effective against any disease, because it cannot be tested, because the pattern is:
> if child unvaxxed then the symptoms must be [insert vaccine-preventable disease]
> if child vaxxed but has the same symptoms as [insert vaccine-preventable disease] then it is called [other disease name and ICD-10] which is indistinguishable from [insert vaccine-preventable disease]

They poison children then claim "oh oh oh the ehm disease we want to protect against, just appeared in the child we vaccinated, bu-bu-but its a immunisation that means it's a good thing, and it's not the diease we want to vaccinate against, b-bu-but it's ehm a random other disease with the same exact symptoms like the disease we want to vaccinate against, but that means it's a good thing".
https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/referral/priorix-article-30-referral-annex-iii_en.pdf