/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8727468
>when using 1998 as a starting point is literally the definition of cherrypicking and data manipulation to suit your own agenda. SAD!
>SAD!
Demoralization. An excellent choice of Shilling techniques.
Hope you're doing better than when you worked for CTR

>>8593480
>>8593473
>>8583560
>>8593449
>>and the temperature of the Holocene or the Cretaceous has no bearing on that.
>I completely agree that we must openly display uncertainty and variability in the climate data. And that includes the uncertainty/variability from alterations to the raw data.


And here is another honest example. Again, is the forthright display of the data part of a conspiracy theory?

>>8578735
> Goal seeked models prove Climate Change is TRUE!
That's why they keep tampering the data, got to pretend their models are accurate.