/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14732517
>>14732791
Jeebuz H. Fucking Christ Almighty dude lay off the Gaby Habermas fixation as if he is the only one who has researched NDEs. Also, one bad researchers in a field DOES NOT imply that all researchers in the field are bad. Would you do the same with physics if you found one bad physics researcher? Lol.... lmao even.

Also, as hinted at in these posts, >>14732475
and >>14732715, the most convincing book on NDEs is this one:

https://www.amazon.com/Why-Afterlife-Obviously-Exists-Realer-Than-Real/dp/1785359851

But there are many others that are convincing as well. I would further recommend The Self Does Not Die, as well as the book Science and the Near-Death Experience: How Consciousness Survives Death by Chris Carter. I would say that anybody on the planet who reads all three of these books will be convinced that the NDE is _NOT_ a hallucination or dream. They are just that convincing and the data and the arguments are just totally overflowing at this point.