/sci/ - Science & Math

When asked if "having a bigger head correlates with higher intelligence", this man made the statement (and I paraphrase a lot here):

>"I think so, if you look at smaller headed animals like dogs and mice it's clear to see that they have less intelligence than us humans, therefore it's resonable to think that having a larger head shows higher intelligence."

This man is a fucking moron. Elephants have larger heads than us and they certainly aren't smarter. No intelligent man would make such a statement.

Dickhead.

>>5580632
sorry but according to science, idea that cant be tested in the real world are not real
therefore mathematical theories are useless cuz you cant test the number 4

>>5561948
troll detected

>>5536805
when i said mechanical i meant the way the experiment is set up

>But it is your measurement device that is fucking with the particle. You do not have telekinetic powers.

if the measurement device interfered with the particle it would only nudge it not fucking transform it from a particle pattern to a wave pattern

Plus when they observed the experiment up closer, the particles appeared to time travel.

>>5520963
Well if he used soul and consciousness as synonyms then he's also using alternative definitions. You have a lot in common. Of course, if anybody respected him, then he probably wasn't trolling and would admit that his rationality required it's own terms (as any system of logic does)

Proceed with the troll thread

>>5476742

>>5337830
I think it's you that's trolling. Anyways, yeah, I'm sure that math majors are in the same boat. A math major of below average intelligence is probably quite worthless. But I had an acquaintance at Uni who was majoring in Financial Mathematics (basically a Math major with a Finance minor), and he's probably going to be insanely successful, but he was eerily intelligent.

>>5332996
This is a good example of how mastertroll has the scientific method backwards. The whole point of the process of science is to obtain verifiable evidence. You don't start out with it. First you use reason, aka philosophy, to formulate a testable, predictive, explanation.. Then, later on, you should be able to obtain scientifically verifiable evidence that your explanation was correct.