/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11221274
Almost forgot about this, but I think you can also use the restriction [math]<v, q> \geq 0[/math], where v is the velocity vector and q is position.
But I haven't actually solved the problem and seen what works, so both of these might fail.

https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-33143-6
Ya boy Shelly Axley just revolutionized mathematical pedagogy again.
Now [math]Open ~ Access^{TM}[/math].

>>11153848
They wouldn't, Sakuya cleans them every day.
>>11154126
Sort of, you need surjectivity of the morphism to P.
Your proof is highly convoluted, have a simple one: Set [math]id: P \rightarrow P[/math] and [math]f: N P[/math]. Because it's surjective, by the definition of projectivity there's a lift to a map [math]g: P \rightarrow N[/math] such that the diagram commutes.
>>11154323
Was that supposed to be 5x^4 +7x^2 + 9?
If so, yes. You set y=x^2 and solve the quadratic normally.
Otherwise no.
>>11154324
Hello.

>>10250492
>sets one of them to 0
>it solves itself lmao