[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.15858527 [View]
File: 35 KB, 772x464, problem.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15858527

I'm having trouble understanding the diagram chase in https://math.stackexchange.com/a/1999115
Specifically the part where the equality of [eqn](X \times_{X/R}A) \times_A (X \times_{X/R}A)'\rightrightarrows X\xrightarrow{f}Z[/eqn] cancels to equality of[eqn](X \times_{X/R}A) \times_A (X \times_{X/R}A)'\rightrightarrows X\xrightarrow{p}X/R[/eqn].
The answer explains this by saying that
>As [math]R[/math] is defined by [math]f[/math], we find then that the morphisms [math](X \times_{X/R}A) \times_A (X \times_{X/R}A)' \rightrightarrows X[/math] factor through [math]R[/math].
but I don't see how this can be justified without assuming what you wish to prove (that [math]g[/math] can be cancelled in the factoring [math]f=g\circ p[/math]).

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]