/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11263264
I've seen this graph before and I've sourced it to this article, which seems to imply there is a saturation effect with CO2.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1260/0958-305X.18.5.615

Maybe I'm just misunderstanding things?

At what ppm does co2 saturation happen?
If co2 is logarithmic is the worst of the warming already over? Wouldn't this explain the slow down in temperature increase since 1998?

>>8670038
A hypothesis is formed from knowledge obtained by questioning reality. All science is based off of questioning reality. Questioning the nature of reality led to physics, questioning the composition of life led to the creation of biology, questioning the composition of the universe led to the creation of astronomy, questioning the history and structure of the earth led to geology, questioning the nature of heat led to thermodynamics, etc.
All science is based off of fundamental questioning of reality. Questioning the nature of our climate and atmosphere led to climate science. Questioning climate science leads to obtaining knowledge about the climate. The scientific method is an iterative loop, you don't get to assert that a result a fraction of way through a loop is the final answer, especially when there are logically and empirically sound criticisms of the rigor and results of climate science.

Nice non-arguement/appeal to emotion, buddy. You're really getting the intellectual community on your side with those ;)