/sci/ - Science & Math

The philosophy of science cucks are claiming relevance of their own field by two arguments:
1. The scientific method was allegedly invented by philosophy. (Historically untrue, but let's play along with them for the argument)
2. The scientific method is flawed and needs improvement which allegedly the scientists themselves can't do.

This yields the following questions:
1. Why would philosophy plebs be proud of producing a flawed method?
2. Why didn't they fix it yet? If they are unable to fix it, then doesn't this show their own uselessness?

While you guys are struggling with failing to fix a flaw you simultanously brag about, in the meantime science explains the world around us.