/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10060432
>The effects are what the science says they are, you still haven't told me why you know better.
I'm not going to pretend to have research every part of the world, but scientist with their 1000x peer review studies have told me all sorts of absurd things about floridas sea levels, and our overall temperature and where they will be by 2020.
We've been experiencing our coldest winters this decade, despite predictions, and sea levels aren't anywhere near why they where projected to be.

So i don't exactly buy the hype with the exaggeration of the affects of climate change, when the predictions are nothing but false for me.

>saying the effects have always bee here is akin to saying the cause has always been here, which is false. The cause only recently got here, it's an unprecedented cause.
No it's not, the cause can be different but the affects are ultimately how they have always been year in and year out. There is no dramatic change in the climate over such a short period of time, and our climate has consistently defied expectation.

>the little ice age doesn't count xD
lmfao, the little ice age occured for over 4 centuries, "global warming" wasn't a meme until 80 years ago.

In fact scientist climb the admission of green house gases is what stopped the little ice age, even though the mass exhaust of such wasn't scene until 100 years after it had ended.