/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15436980
>In your terminology, RH is actually the hypothesis that the Riemann zeta function has non-trivial zeroes off the critical line with real and imaginary parts in the neighborhood of the origin
You are 100% full of shit. I am posting the official problem description from Clay which shows that you are lying. Riemann's paper is on the internet too and you can see that he does not restrict to the neighborhood of the origin. Furthermore, the only thing that matters is if my solution sheds sufficient light on the prime number application which made RH so interesting to begin with. All of these people trying to redefine real numbers as only the neighborhood of the origin are completely stupid. It's like they're saying they don't want to know about the prime number application if the analysis of the question involves numbers that are larger than any natural number. Obviously, I haven't looked at the prime number application yet but I heard from three different frog memes that my solution does everything that is expected.
>It's like they're saying they don't want to know about the prime number application if the analysis of the question involves numbers that are larger than any natural number.