/sci/ - Science & Math

prove me wrong.

Literally can't into math or stat at all, which is why 90% of their field is not reproducible.
It's all just heuristics and pathways too. This is why spaced repetition is so effective for it with little to no configuration or thought put into that process itself: Because it's memorizing a bunch of rather disjoint facts. If 80iq redneck boomers can memorize 200k jeopardy questions, so can med midwits memorize 50k flash cards.

These people wouldn't last a day in a pure math or theoretical/mathematical physics course. Hell, even chemistry would be too difficult for them. There's a reason why every 2nd chem student fails physical chemistry...

>>11393656
Holy shit. I just realized it's barely been three months since the old prototype blew up.
A lot of stuff going on these past few months for me so I lost track of time. If you would've asked me, I would've thought it had been like half a year ago. But the fact that SpaceX completely overhauled all of their production methods in that time and is already maybe a month or so away from another working prototype is insane.

Pros
No gravity wells - less cost for travel and smaller asteroid impact rate
Gravity control, both 0G and 1G for recreation and industry
Climate control
Atmosphere control
Daylight cycle control
Can be built anywhere
Constant solar energy
More efficient use of mass, both for generating gravity and pressure

Cons
Large upfront cost(Lower than terraforming, but still higher than simply building an outpost in a body such as the moon)
No developed industry yet
No natural magnetosphere
No natural resources(unless built inside an asteroid, resources always have to be transported from somewhere else)

How about. Just stop giving a fuck?
I do it all the time. It answers all my probloms

>>7519202
>nothing mathematical
>>7519186
>>7519173

What anime do you guys watch?

What the fuck is calculus?