/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8997063
>All of his material is readily availible.
So? He doesn't actually cite any evidence to support his claims.

>"Photoshopped" or suppressed?
Before they closed off the cave, thousands of people toured it. Are you actually claiming that there's some kind of conspiracy to hide these paintings despite all the people who would have seen it? I mean, it's pretty obvious that the horses and the people were painted by different hands; the art style is completely different and more realistic, and the the people include white pigment, as opposed to the browns and reds found elsewhere in Lascaux.
here, I'll do you one better. see that horse on the right in the photoshopped picture you posted? pic related is the original version of that horse. you can check; it's the same exact one, down to the finest details. know what it doesn't have in it? a painting of a caveman.

also, I've actually BEEN to the Denver Museum of Nature and Science. it doesn't HAVE an exhibit on Lascaux.
but here you are, claiming that an obviously photoshopped picture (attributed to a source that doesn't have anything related to it) is actually real and that there's a decades-long conspiracy involving tens of thousands of people to keep it under wraps.
do you realize how insane that sounds? >>>/x/ you moronic bundle of sticks