/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11663288
I expected this response and have seen it 100 time, but you're just plain wrong and coping
We've seen already 3 generations and they're only improving in scores, income and jobs which disproves your conjecture as per >>11663255


Also people do regress to the mean, but not that of the population they come from but to the mean of their parents, since IQ is genetic. (this is strongly insinuated in the wiki article you linked)

Let me put it this way, if the average IQ of indians in the UK is 110 now, it will forever be 110 simply because of how highly heritable IQ is. And this is exactly what has been observed in the UK and US.

That is actually the whole basis for eugenics and why breeding people with higher IQ will yield a higher IQ population.

Generally speaking a person's IQ is not a random number around a population mean, it's far closer to their parents' mean. Possibly because IQ is so extremely polygenic - results in an additive effect overall.

How much of this is genetics
I suspect polfags will tell me immigrants from india are superior to their peers